Part C4 · Claims to Drop

Popular Claims to Drop

Several popular behavioural claims have no study behind them or failed large replications. Retire them from decks and briefs.

Popular Claims to Drop · Illustrated by Hendra Saputra with AI assistanceSelect the illustration to explore it at a larger size.

The idea

The supplied reference challenges unsupported precision in claims such as “95% subconscious” and fixed universal loss-aversion multipliers. It also notes replication concerns for ego depletion, limits to choice-overload claims and the retraction of a key honesty-pledge study. Trace the original source, check corrections and replications, and state what the evidence can support in the decision at hand.

Use it thoughtfully

  • Ask for the original study and its sample size.
  • Check whether anyone has repeated it.
  • Replace myths with your own test results.

An example

ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLE: A campaign brief citing '95% of decisions are subconscious' is rewritten to 'Many purchases are fast; make the offer clear at a glance.'

A question to try

Which claim in your current strategy deck would you struggle to source?

A useful framework is a starting point, not a guarantee. Effects vary with the audience, product and situation. Use truthful evidence, respect customer choice, and test the result.

Connect the ideas

Illustration

Use + and − to zoom, scroll to explore, or Escape to close. Please seek permission before reusing an illustration.